CAFC Affirms PTAB’s Decision That Printed Matter Doctrine Can Be Used In Claim Construction

By Reza Mollaaghababa In an inter partes review proceeding, a challenger cannot raise patent-eligibility as a ground of invalidity.  Rather, the invalidity grounds are limited to lack of novelty and obviousness.  Notwithstanding, in construing claim terms, the PTAB can decide not to give patentable weight to certain claim limitations that are not patent-eligible. In Praxair … Continue reading CAFC Affirms PTAB’s Decision That Printed Matter Doctrine Can Be Used In Claim Construction

SAS Institute Decision Causes Turmoil At The PTAB

By Tom Engellenner The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision this week in SAS Institute v. Iancu has upended a major provision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) regulations for inter partes and post grant review proceedings conducted by its Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).  By concluding in a 5-4 decision that the agency … Continue reading SAS Institute Decision Causes Turmoil At The PTAB

SCOTUS Holds Inter Partes Review Proceedings Valid In “Narrow” Decision

By Aparna Nemlekar This week the Supreme Court of the United States (“Supreme Court”), in a 7-2 decision, held that inter partes review (“IPR”) proceedings conducted by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) do not violate Article III or implicate the Seventh Amendment. This decision in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy … Continue reading SCOTUS Holds Inter Partes Review Proceedings Valid In “Narrow” Decision

PTAB gives Apple’s Foe a Second Bite by Granting Realtime Data’s Motion to Amend

By Reza Mollaaghababa In an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding, a patent owner may file one motion to amend the patent in one or more of the following ways: (a) cancel any challenged patent claim, or (b) for each challenged claim, propose a reasonable number of substitute claims.  35 U.S.C. §316(d).  1290.  With regard to … Continue reading PTAB gives Apple’s Foe a Second Bite by Granting Realtime Data’s Motion to Amend