Category Archives: Anticipation/Obvious

CAFC Affirms PTAB’s Decision That Printed Matter Doctrine Can Be Used In Claim Construction

By Reza Mollaaghababa In an inter partes review proceeding, a challenger cannot raise patent-eligibility as a ground of invalidity.  Rather, the invalidity grounds are limited to lack of novelty and obviousness.  Notwithstanding, in construing claim terms, the PTAB can decide … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, Appeals, Claim Construction, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, Federal Circuit, Mental Steps Doctrine, Patent Eligible Subject Matter, Printed Matter Doctrine, USPTO | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Once The Federal Circuit Affirms A PTAB Finding Of Invalidity, Collateral Estoppel Prevents Patent Owner From Asserting The Claims In Any Further Proceeding

By Reza Mollaaghababa On May 23, 2018, in XY, LLC v. Trans Ova Genetics, L.C., CAFC held that its affirmance of PTAB’s invalidity decision regarding certain claims of a patent owned by XY in a separate appeal involving a different … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipation/Obvious, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, Covered Business Methods, Federal Circuit, Final PTAB Decision, Inter Partes Review, Post Grant Review, USPTO | Tagged , , , ,

SCOTUS Holds Inter Partes Review Proceedings Valid In “Narrow” Decision

By Aparna Nemlekar This week the Supreme Court of the United States (“Supreme Court”), in a 7-2 decision, held that inter partes review (“IPR”) proceedings conducted by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) do not violate Article III or … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, Constitutionality, Supreme Court, USPTO | Tagged , , , , , ,

CAFC Affirms PTAB’s Decision To Invalidate Cialis and Adcirca Patents

By Reza Mollaaghababa In a recent decision, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed decisions in two inter-partes review (IPR) proceedings that patents owned by ICOS Corporation directed to tadalafil formulations (used in the erectile dysfunction drug, … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipation/Obvious, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, Federal Circuit, Inter Partes Review, Post Grant Review, PTAB Procedure, Trial Tactics, USPTO | Tagged , , , , , , , ,

PTAB gives Apple’s Foe a Second Bite by Granting Realtime Data’s Motion to Amend

By Reza Mollaaghababa In an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding, a patent owner may file one motion to amend the patent in one or more of the following ways: (a) cancel any challenged patent claim, or (b) for each challenged … Continue reading

Posted in Amendments before the PTAB, America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, Inter Partes Review, PTAB Procedure, Trial Tactics | Tagged , , , ,