Category Archives: Appeals

CAFC Affirms PTAB’s Decision That Printed Matter Doctrine Can Be Used In Claim Construction

By Reza Mollaaghababa In an inter partes review proceeding, a challenger cannot raise patent-eligibility as a ground of invalidity.  Rather, the invalidity grounds are limited to lack of novelty and obviousness.  Notwithstanding, in construing claim terms, the PTAB can decide … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, Appeals, Claim Construction, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, Federal Circuit, Mental Steps Doctrine, Patent Eligible Subject Matter, Printed Matter Doctrine, USPTO | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

SAS Institute Decision Causes Turmoil At The PTAB

By Tom Engellenner The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision this week in SAS Institute v. Iancu has upended a major provision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) regulations for inter partes and post grant review proceedings conducted by its … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Appeals, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, Federal Circuit, Final PTAB Decision, Instittion Decision, Inter Partes Review, Post Grant Review, PTAB Procedure, Stays, Supreme Court, Trial Tactics, USPTO | Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

PTAB Can Rely on New Evidence Introduced by Petitioner in its Reply

By Tom Engellenner In a decision last month, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit gave petitioners in AIA proceedings yet another weapon to invalidate patents – by affirming a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision that relied, … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, Appeals, Experts, Federal Circuit, Final PTAB Decision, Instittion Decision, Inter Partes Review, PTAB Procedure, Trial Tactics, USPTO | Tagged , , , , , , ,

IPR Estoppel Provisions May Not Be That Scary After All

By Yue (Joy) Wang IPR petitioners wary of the statutory estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) may have reason to be cautiously optimistic.   Judge Sue Robinson of the Federal District Court of Delaware recently held that Toshiba is not estopped … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, Appeals, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, District Court, Estoppel, Federal Circuit, Final PTAB Decision, Instittion Decision, Post Grant Review, Section 315(e) bar | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Federal Circuit Requires Standing To Appeal An IPR Decision

By Reza Mollaaghababa In the case of Phygenix, Inc. v. ImmunoGen, Inc., the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) held that the petitioner (Phygenix) that had unsuccessfully challenged certain claims of ImmunoGen’s U.S. Patent No. 8,337,856 (“the ‘856 … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Appeals, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, Federal Circuit, Final PTAB Decision, Inter Partes Review, Post Grant Review, Trial Tactics | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,