Category Archives: Claim Construction

CAFC Finds Another PTAB Claim Construction Unreasonable and Again Reverses an Invalidity Holding

By Reza Mollaaghababa In an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding, the meaning of terms used in challenged claims of an unexpired patent are given their broadest reasonable interpretation in light of the claim language and the specification. The Court of … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, BRI Standard, Broadest Reasonable Interpretation, Claim Construction, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, Federal Circuit, Final PTAB Decision, Inter Partes Review, PTAB Procedure, Trial Tactics, USPTO | Tagged , , , , , , ,

Bass’s First IPR Decision Rendered – Victory for Patent Owner, Shire Lpc

By Tom Engellenner If Kyle Bass’s Coalition for Affordable Drugs Series II hedge fund was hoping to reap a windfall from short positions in Shire Plc’s stock this week, it was dealt a major setback by a Patent Trial and … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipation/Obvious, Claim Construction, Final PTAB Decision, Inter Partes Review, PTAB Procedure | Tagged , , , , , , ,

CAFC Vacates a PTAB Decision Due To Faulty Claim Construction

By Reza Mollaaghababa In a rare case of disagreeing with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) vacated and remanded a PTAB decision invalidating claims 10-25 of PPC Broadband, Inc.’s U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, Appeals, BRI Standard, Broadest Reasonable Interpretation, Claim Construction, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, Federal Circuit, Inter Partes Review, PTAB Procedure, USPTO | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Federal Circuit Affirms Invalidity Of A Merck Patent Based On Substantial Evidence Standard

The Federal Circuit will apply a relaxed standard for review of the Patent Office’s post grant patent review proceedings and will give a good deal of deference to PTAB “findings of facts.” Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, Broadest Reasonable Interpretation, Claim Construction, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, Covered Business Methods, Inter Partes Review, Post Grant Review, PTAB Procedure, USPTO | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

A Decision Not to Institute a Trial at the PTAB Does Not Carry Much Weight in Federal Court

By Tom Engellenner Two recent cases show that simply avoiding a post-grant review proceeding at the U.S. Patent Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) not only does not preclude a defendant in underlying patent infringement litigation in a federal … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipation/Obvious, Claim Construction, District Court, Instittion Decision, Trial Tactics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , ,