The PTAB Definitely Cannot do That

Photo of John P. Isacson
John P. Isacson

Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. Priusa Engineering Corp., Appeal Nos. 2019-1169, -1260 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 4, 2020).

Samsung filed an IPR petition against claims 1-4, 8 and 11 of U.S. Patent No. 8,650,591 owned by Priusa. The ‘591 patent was directed to editing video streams by substituting one object for a different one, such as a face. Slip op. at 4-5. Continue reading “The PTAB Definitely Cannot do That”

Do Not Pass Go? U.S. Supreme Court to Review Federal Circuit’s Finding of Justiciability

patelsj_thumb
Shaleen J. Patel

This article was published in February 2020 issue of IP Strategist.  Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC.  It is republished here with permission.

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to determine just how “final and nonappealable” a decision to institute an inter partes review is. The highest court is primed to render yet another opinion related to patent and administrative law in Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Techs., L.P., No. 19-916 (2019) after oral arguments were heard on Dec. 9, 2019. Continue reading “Do Not Pass Go? U.S. Supreme Court to Review Federal Circuit’s Finding of Justiciability”

The Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art Still Counts

Photo of John P. Isacson
John P. Isacson

Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Google LLC et al., Appeal No. 2019-1177 (Fed. Cir., January 30, 2020).

Google filed an IPR against Philips’ patent relating to a method of forming a media presentation on a client device from multiple related files. Google’s IPR petition presented two grounds of unpatentability (anticipation and obviousness) based upon the SMIL 1.0 reference supported by general knowledge in the art regarding distributed media presentations, referred to as pipelining. The general knowledge in the art was supported an expert declaration and the Hua reference, although Hua was not made part of a combination with SMIL 1.0 by Google. Continue reading “The Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art Still Counts”