PTAB gives Apple’s Foe a Second Bite by Granting Realtime Data’s Motion to Amend

By Reza Mollaaghababa In an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding, a patent owner may file one motion to amend the patent in one or more of the following ways: (a) cancel any challenged patent claim, or (b) for each challenged claim, propose a reasonable number of substitute claims.  35 U.S.C. §316(d).  1290.  With regard to … Continue reading PTAB gives Apple’s Foe a Second Bite by Granting Realtime Data’s Motion to Amend

First AIA Derivation Trial Instituted by PTAB

By Aparna Nemlekar On March 21, 2018, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) instituted the first AIA derivation proceeding to determine whether patent claims to a window frame component should be canceled because they were derived from others not listed as inventors. The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) amended 35 U.S.C. § 135 to … Continue reading First AIA Derivation Trial Instituted by PTAB

PTAB Issues Guidelines for Motions to Amend

By Reza Mollaaghababa An en banc panel of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in the case of Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal recently held that in an inter-partes (IPR) proceeding, the burden of persuasion rests with the challenger to persuade the PATB that substitute claims proposed by a patent owner in … Continue reading PTAB Issues Guidelines for Motions to Amend

Federal Circuit Slams PTAB Amendment Policy

By Tom Engellenner On October 4, 2017, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, overruled an earlier panel decision and found that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) had been impermissibly placing the burden of proving the patentability of amended claims on the Patent Owner, rather than the Petitioner.   See, … Continue reading Federal Circuit Slams PTAB Amendment Policy