Tag Archives: estoppel

IPR Estoppel Provisions May Not Be That Scary After All

By Yue (Joy) Wang IPR petitioners wary of the statutory estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) may have reason to be cautiously optimistic.   Judge Sue Robinson of the Federal District Court of Delaware recently held that Toshiba is not estopped … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, Appeals, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, District Court, Estoppel, Federal Circuit, Final PTAB Decision, Instittion Decision, Post Grant Review, Section 315(e) bar | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Estoppel Does Not Attach When Petitioner’s Grounds Are Denied As Redundant

By Reza Mollaaghababa Under 35 U.S.C. 315(e)(1), a petitioner in an inter partes review of a claim in a patent that has resulted in a final written decision by the Board may not request or maintain a proceeding before the … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, Estoppel, Instittion Decision, Inter Partes Review, Trial Tactics, USPTO | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Affirmative Defense of Invalidity As Part of a Motion to Intervene Does Not Bar Filing of a Subsequent IPR Petition

By Reza Mollaaghababa According to 35 U.S.C. §315(a), an inter partes review may not be instituted if, before the date on which the petition for such a review is filed, the petitioner or real party in interest filed a civil … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, District Court, Estoppel, Instittion Decision, Inter Partes Review, Motion to Intervene, Section 315(a) bar, Trial Tactics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

PTAB Strikes Down Patent Claims — Despite Settlement and Request from Parties to Terminate Proceeding

By Tom Engellenner Last week we reported on a case (Blackberry v. MobileMedia Ideas) in which a PTAB panel refused to terminate an inter partes review proceeding with respect to the patent owner despite a settlement reached by the parties.  … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, Covered Business Methods, District Court, Estoppel, PTAB Procedure, Trial Tactics, Uncategorized, USPTO | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

The More the Merrier – Joinder under the AIA

By Ben Snitkoff Under the America Invents Act (AIA), parties to an Inter Partes Review (IPR) or Post Grant Review (PGR) may move to join pending IPR or PGR proceedings. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.122 (for IPR), and 37 C.F.R. … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Estoppel, Inter Partes Review, PTAB Procedure | Tagged , ,