By Tom Engellenner
Much has occurred during the first year after the America Invents Act (AIA) established several new procedures for the public to challenge issued patents and a new administrative court to hear these cases. Here are some observations on the first year of this evolving practice.
1. Many More IPR Petitions Have Been Filed Than CBM Review Petitions.
Although Congress expected the Covered Business Method (CBM) review process would be widely used by irate businesses tired of dealing with so-called “business method” patents, only 67 CBM petitions were filed during the first year compared to nearly 500 petitions for Inter Partes Review (IPR). Many practitioners thought the more expansive grounds for challenge in CBM review (permitting challenges based on prior public uses and sales as well as prior art publications) would have piqued more interest, especially in tandem with recent Supreme Court decisions roundly criticizing non-technological patent claims. However, IPRs have been more widely invoked, probably reflecting the much larger number of non-business method patents being asserted in litigation.
2. The PTAB is Quite Willing to Initiate IPR Proceedings when a Petition is Filed
Over 86% of the IPR petitions filed in the first year have been granted –at least in part. Continue reading “Lessons From The First Year Of Post Grant Proceedings In The U.S.”