Tag Archives: IPR procedure

Federal Circuit Requires Standing To Appeal An IPR Decision

By Reza Mollaaghababa In the case of Phygenix, Inc. v. ImmunoGen, Inc., the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) held that the petitioner (Phygenix) that had unsuccessfully challenged certain claims of ImmunoGen’s U.S. Patent No. 8,337,856 (“the ‘856 … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Appeals, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, Federal Circuit, Final PTAB Decision, Inter Partes Review, Post Grant Review, Trial Tactics | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Estoppel Does Not Attach When Petitioner’s Grounds Are Denied As Redundant

By Reza Mollaaghababa Under 35 U.S.C. 315(e)(1), a petitioner in an inter partes review of a claim in a patent that has resulted in a final written decision by the Board may not request or maintain a proceeding before the … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, Estoppel, Instittion Decision, Inter Partes Review, Trial Tactics, USPTO | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

New Final Rules for Post-Grant Proceedings Published by USPTO on April Fools Day

By Tom Engellenner The USPTO has gone ahead and finalized new rules for post-grant proceedings under the America Invents Act (AIA) – despite heavy criticism that the rules do little to alter the lopsided nature of these proceedings. The new … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Covered Business Methods, Instittion Decision, Inter Partes Review, Post Grant Review, PTAB Procedure, Trial Tactics, USPTO | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Affirmative Defense of Invalidity As Part of a Motion to Intervene Does Not Bar Filing of a Subsequent IPR Petition

By Reza Mollaaghababa According to 35 U.S.C. §315(a), an inter partes review may not be instituted if, before the date on which the petition for such a review is filed, the petitioner or real party in interest filed a civil … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, District Court, Estoppel, Instittion Decision, Inter Partes Review, Motion to Intervene, Section 315(a) bar, Trial Tactics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

CAFC Vacates a PTAB Decision Due To Faulty Claim Construction

By Reza Mollaaghababa In a rare case of disagreeing with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) vacated and remanded a PTAB decision invalidating claims 10-25 of PPC Broadband, Inc.’s U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, Appeals, BRI Standard, Broadest Reasonable Interpretation, Claim Construction, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, Federal Circuit, Inter Partes Review, PTAB Procedure, USPTO | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,