Tag Archives: obviousness

CAFC Affirms PTAB’s Decision That Printed Matter Doctrine Can Be Used In Claim Construction

By Reza Mollaaghababa In an inter partes review proceeding, a challenger cannot raise patent-eligibility as a ground of invalidity.  Rather, the invalidity grounds are limited to lack of novelty and obviousness.  Notwithstanding, in construing claim terms, the PTAB can decide … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, Appeals, Claim Construction, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, Federal Circuit, Mental Steps Doctrine, Patent Eligible Subject Matter, Printed Matter Doctrine, USPTO | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

SCOTUS Holds Inter Partes Review Proceedings Valid In “Narrow” Decision

By Aparna Nemlekar This week the Supreme Court of the United States (“Supreme Court”), in a 7-2 decision, held that inter partes review (“IPR”) proceedings conducted by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) do not violate Article III or … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, Constitutionality, Supreme Court, USPTO | Tagged , , , , , ,

CAFC Affirms PTAB’s Decision To Invalidate Cialis and Adcirca Patents

By Reza Mollaaghababa In a recent decision, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed decisions in two inter-partes review (IPR) proceedings that patents owned by ICOS Corporation directed to tadalafil formulations (used in the erectile dysfunction drug, … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipation/Obvious, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, Federal Circuit, Inter Partes Review, Post Grant Review, PTAB Procedure, Trial Tactics, USPTO | Tagged , , , , , , , ,

PTAB gives Apple’s Foe a Second Bite by Granting Realtime Data’s Motion to Amend

By Reza Mollaaghababa In an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding, a patent owner may file one motion to amend the patent in one or more of the following ways: (a) cancel any challenged patent claim, or (b) for each challenged … Continue reading

Posted in Amendments before the PTAB, America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, Inter Partes Review, PTAB Procedure, Trial Tactics | Tagged , , , ,

Federal Circuit Criticizes PTAB for Failing to Properly Weigh Objective Evidence of Non-Obviousness

By Tom Engellenner The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals again vacated a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) panel decision for failing to properly evaluate “objective evidence of non-obviousness” and remanded the case for determinations consistent with its opinion. Specifically, … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Anticipation/Obvious, Court of Appeals Fed Circuit, Final PTAB Decision, Inter Partes Review, Post Grant Review, PTAB Procedure, Reexamination, USPTO | Tagged , , , , ,